[2003/01/14 00:47:59] #net-snmp <hampa> what is the difference between the uptime sent with nsNotify traps and coldstart traps
[2003/01/14 00:48:22] #net-snmp <hampa> 0:0:01:02.49 <- shutdown
[2003/01/14 00:48:33] #net-snmp <hampa> 0:0:00:00.74 <- coldstart
[2003/01/14 00:48:40] #net-snmp <hampa> root@regr-apc bin]# uptime
[2003/01/14 00:48:41] #net-snmp <hampa> 9:42am up 20:21, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.04, 0.01
[2003/01/14 00:58:06] #net-snmp <hampa> hmm.. and the uptime I get when sending traps is 0:20:32:27.52
--> dts has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 03:24:18] #net-snmp <dts> hampa: are you there?
[2003/01/14 03:51:01] #net-snmp <hampa> yes
[2003/01/14 03:55:52] #net-snmp <dts> Sorry - nipped out for a sandwich
[2003/01/14 03:56:06] #net-snmp <dts> You were asking about the "uptime" figures - yes?
[2003/01/14 04:06:40] #net-snmp <hampa> I think I have figured them out
[2003/01/14 04:07:02] #net-snmp <hampa> the uptime with traps is the uptime of my machine
[2003/01/14 04:07:21] #net-snmp <hampa> uptime with shutdown is uptime for snmpd
[2003/01/14 04:07:52] #net-snmp <hampa> uptime with coldstart is uptime for snmpd (which is zero since it is restarting)
[2003/01/14 04:08:09] #net-snmp <dts> Yup - that sounds about right.
[2003/01/14 04:08:36] #net-snmp <dts> Remember, sysUpTime is the uptime of the SNMP engine, not the host
[2003/01/14 04:09:12] #net-snmp <hampa> I also noticed that the new net-snmp send nsNotificationXXX traps.. when restarting
[2003/01/14 04:09:20] #net-snmp <hampa> ucd-snmp did not do that
[2003/01/14 04:09:31] #net-snmp <dts> For the command-line trap generator, it's not clear what this should be - so we use the host uptime.
[2003/01/14 04:10:09] #net-snmp <dts> Yes - we're (slowly) trying to move to the new netSnmp tree, and notifications were the first
[2003/01/14 04:10:13] #net-snmp <dts> bit to be addressed.
[2003/01/14 04:11:04] #net-snmp <hampa> I need to catch the new traps.. is it only nsNotification start, shutdown and restart that are new?
[2003/01/14 04:16:12] #net-snmp <dts> $ cd agent ; grep send_easy *.c
[2003/01/14 04:16:24] #net-snmp <dts> send_easy_trap(SNMP_TRAP_ENTERPRISESPECIFIC, 2);
[2003/01/14 04:16:31] #net-snmp <dts> send_easy_trap(0, 0);
[2003/01/14 04:16:39] #net-snmp <dts> send_easy_trap(SNMP_TRAP_ENTERPRISESPECIFIC, 3);
[2003/01/14 04:17:36] #net-snmp <dts> 2=Shutdown 3=Restart
[2003/01/14 04:22:32] #net-snmp <dts> I think we always sent a "shutdown" trap, but there wasn't a sensible "restart" trap to use
[2003/01/14 04:22:36] #net-snmp <dts> So we defined our own.
[2003/01/14 04:23:26] #net-snmp <hampa> ok.. thanks
--> wes has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 05:31:52] #net-snmp <dts> Mornin' Wes
[2003/01/14 05:32:04] #net-snmp <dts> Up early again, I see....
[2003/01/14 05:32:13] #net-snmp <wes> yawn.
[2003/01/14 05:32:18] #net-snmp <wes> sigh.
[2003/01/14 05:32:44] #net-snmp <wes> some days it's easier to get up early than it is to go back to sleep for another half-hour or so.
[2003/01/14 05:33:09] #net-snmp <dts> Hmmmm.... I'll take your word for it.
[2003/01/14 05:33:23] #net-snmp <dts> We don't have children, so I wouldn't know.....
[2003/01/14 05:33:26] #net-snmp <wes> but hey, the world isn't spinning *that* much.
[2003/01/14 05:33:48] #net-snmp <wes> well you should get some!
[2003/01/14 05:33:57] #net-snmp <wes> I think rent-a-child would be a good first step.
[2003/01/14 05:34:00] #net-snmp <dts> No thanks - I've already eaten.
[2003/01/14 05:34:04] #net-snmp <wes> maybe there is a rent-to-own package.
[2003/01/14 05:44:25] #net-snmp <wes> I'm gonna create a branch right now unless you think there is a reason not to?
--> diablo has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 05:45:27] #net-snmp <dts> No - you go right ahead....
[2003/01/14 05:45:29] #net-snmp <diablo> hy
[2003/01/14 05:45:32] #net-snmp <wes> hi
[2003/01/14 05:45:38] #net-snmp <diablo> I have a question
[2003/01/14 05:45:53] #net-snmp <diablo> I'm trying to compile net-snmp-5.0.7 on a Solaris 2.8
[2003/01/14 05:46:00] #net-snmp <diablo> and the compilation failes with
[2003/01/14 05:46:12] #net-snmp <diablo> /usr/include/sys/swap.h:47:2: #error "Cannot use swapctl in the large files compilation environment"
[2003/01/14 05:46:12] #net-snmp <diablo> make[2]: *** [ucd-snmp/memory_solaris2.lo] Error 1
[2003/01/14 05:46:12] #net-snmp <diablo> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/tmp/teste/net-snmp-5.0.7/agent/mibgroup'
[2003/01/14 05:46:12] #net-snmp <diablo> make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
[2003/01/14 05:46:12] #net-snmp <diablo> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/tmp/teste/net-snmp-5.0.7/agent'
[2003/01/14 05:47:03] #net-snmp <diablo> does anybody know how i can solve this ?
[2003/01/14 05:47:19] #net-snmp <diablo> I mean, to disable te use of swapctl
[2003/01/14 05:47:23] #net-snmp <wes> I thought that was discussed in README.solaris.
[2003/01/14 05:47:27] #net-snmp <wes> but I don't see it now.
[2003/01/14 05:47:39] #net-snmp <diablo> wes: I've read the READ.Solaris but nothing
[2003/01/14 05:48:07] #net-snmp <diablo> wes: any ideeas ?
[2003/01/14 05:48:29] #net-snmp <dts> configure --with-out-mib-modules=ucd-snmp/memory might help, but it's not ideal :-(
[2003/01/14 05:49:11] #net-snmp <diablo> dts: I'll try this right away to see if it works
[2003/01/14 05:50:23] #net-snmp <wes> you might just try removing HAVE_SYS_SWAP_H definition from include/net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h and see if that fixes it (thoughI doubt it. I think it'll just break something else)
[2003/01/14 05:52:57] #net-snmp <diablo> wes: I guess is kind of dangerous to do that. I don't know what are the consequences
[2003/01/14 05:53:09] #net-snmp <wes> diablo: if trogl logs on to this channel later, you might bug him as well. I thought he ran into the problem and knows more about it.
[2003/01/14 05:53:37] #net-snmp <wes> Either it'll compile or it won't. If it doesn't, then dts's suggestion will definititely work.
[2003/01/14 05:53:46] #net-snmp <diablo> wes: k. thx a lot
[2003/01/14 05:59:35] #net-snmp <hampa> how do I specify lauthNoPriv, passphrase etc with MRTG.. I only seem to be able to specify community
[2003/01/14 06:01:05] #net-snmp <hampa> hmm.. maby I just should put them in my snmp.conf
[2003/01/14 06:01:39] #net-snmp <wes> mrtg doesn't support SNMPv3
[2003/01/14 06:01:42] #net-snmp <wes> (last I checked)
[2003/01/14 06:02:00] #net-snmp <hampa> ok.. that explains it
[2003/01/14 06:06:18] #net-snmp <wes> branch created, btw.
[2003/01/14 06:06:42] #net-snmp <wes> ACTION is off for a touch to read a document over coffee
[2003/01/14 06:07:19] #net-snmp <wes> (ok, cvs is slow... it's taking a while to finish but it's nearly done)
[2003/01/14 07:40:50] #net-snmp <hampa> I do a snmpwalk -v2c -c stat and it reboots my machine
[2003/01/14 07:40:54] #net-snmp <hampa> strange
[2003/01/14 07:41:08] #net-snmp <hampa> it works with version 3
[2003/01/14 07:41:35] #net-snmp <dts> Very strange - I suggest you don't do that, then!
[2003/01/14 07:41:53] #net-snmp <hampa> I need it for mrtg
[2003/01/14 07:42:35] #net-snmp <hampa> hmm.. i will look into it some more
--> snmpbot has joined #net-snmp
--> TrogL has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 09:25:50] #net-snmp <TrogL> is anybody doing binaries for Solaris? I know i volunteered, but I'm not up to speed on how to create packages
[2003/01/14 09:27:08] #net-snmp <TrogL> I saw the build package script in patches (654581)
[2003/01/14 09:28:41] #net-snmp <TrogL> I suppose I could give it a shot and see how happy I am with it
[2003/01/14 09:35:36] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: hy, wes sayd that you might help me
[2003/01/14 09:35:52] #net-snmp <diablo> I'm trying to compile net-snmp-5.0.7 on a Solaris 2.8
[2003/01/14 09:35:53] #net-snmp <TrogL> go ahead
[2003/01/14 09:36:02] #net-snmp <TrogL> rigth up my alley
[2003/01/14 09:36:02] #net-snmp <diablo> and the compilation failes with
[2003/01/14 09:36:08] #net-snmp <diablo> /usr/include/sys/swap.h:47:2: #error "Cannot use swapctl in the large files compilation environment"
[2003/01/14 09:36:13] #net-snmp <TrogL> yep
[2003/01/14 09:36:16] #net-snmp <TrogL> that's a long story
[2003/01/14 09:36:19] #net-snmp <diablo> ;-))
[2003/01/14 09:36:24] #net-snmp <TrogL> it has to do with your Perl version
[2003/01/14 09:36:32] #net-snmp <TrogL> do you absolutely have to have Perl support?
[2003/01/14 09:36:42] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: not quite
[2003/01/14 09:36:58] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: if I remove de perl support this is going cu work ?
[2003/01/14 09:36:59] #net-snmp <TrogL> if you take out --with-perl-modules you'll be all set
[2003/01/14 09:37:11] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: k. I'll try now. thx a lot
[2003/01/14 09:37:14] #net-snmp <TrogL> hang on
[2003/01/14 09:37:20] #net-snmp <TrogL> rm config.cache
[2003/01/14 09:37:27] #net-snmp <TrogL> or do a make distclean
[2003/01/14 09:37:32] #net-snmp <TrogL> otherwise it won't work right
[2003/01/14 09:37:50] #net-snmp <TrogL> it'll remember leftover perl inforamtion taht 's confusing it
[2003/01/14 09:38:12] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: ofc ;-)
[2003/01/14 09:38:32] #net-snmp <TrogL> lemme know
[2003/01/14 09:38:42] #net-snmp <diablo> k
[2003/01/14 10:01:24] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: is seems to work ;-)
[2003/01/14 10:01:38] #net-snmp <TrogL> there ya go
[2003/01/14 10:05:01] #net-snmp <TrogL> what did your configure statement look like?
[2003/01/14 10:06:07] #net-snmp <diablo> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/net-snmp-5.0.7/ \
[2003/01/14 10:06:07] #net-snmp <diablo> --enable-ipv6 --enable-internal-md5 --with-default-snmp-version="2" \
[2003/01/14 10:06:07] #net-snmp <diablo> --with-sys-contact="" --with-transports="UDP UDPIPv6 \
[2003/01/14 10:06:07] #net-snmp <diablo> TCPIPv6 TCP Unix" \
[2003/01/14 10:06:07] #net-snmp <diablo> --with-out-mib-modules="ucd-snmp/memory" \
[2003/01/14 10:06:08] #net-snmp <diablo> --with-mib-modules="disman/event-mib smux \
[2003/01/14 10:06:10] #net-snmp <diablo> mibII/mta_sendmail ucd-snmp/diskio" \
[2003/01/14 10:06:12] #net-snmp <diablo> --enable-ucd-snmp-compatibility --enable-shared \
[2003/01/14 10:06:16] #net-snmp <diablo> --with-sys-location="RoEduNet Iasi Branch" \
[2003/01/14 10:06:18] #net-snmp <diablo> --with-logfile=/usr/local/net-snmp-5.0.7/snmpd.log \
[2003/01/14 10:06:20] #net-snmp <diablo> --with-persistent-directory=/usr/local/net-snmp-5.0.7/
[2003/01/14 10:06:22] #net-snmp <diablo> ;-)
[2003/01/14 10:07:00] #net-snmp <TrogL> how come no "host" ?
[2003/01/14 10:07:02] #net-snmp <diablo> this is the right one
[2003/01/14 10:07:22] #net-snmp <diablo> what host ?
[2003/01/14 10:07:34] #net-snmp <TrogL> --with-mib-modules="host"
[2003/01/14 10:08:44] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: aaa
--> benr has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 10:08:53] #net-snmp <TrogL> you just gotta have "host"
[2003/01/14 10:08:56] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: I didn't know what that is
[2003/01/14 10:09:13] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: k. I'll put that module too
[2003/01/14 10:10:10] #net-snmp <TrogL> i generally put in agentx and ucd-snmp/dlmod
[2003/01/14 10:11:31] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: i need snmp of that machine just for sendmail snmp
[2003/01/14 10:11:45] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: i to draw some graphs for sendmail usage
[2003/01/14 10:11:49] #net-snmp <TrogL> ah
[2003/01/14 10:11:52] #net-snmp <diablo> i need to
[2003/01/14 10:11:57] #net-snmp <TrogL> then the other stuff's gonna be overkill
[2003/01/14 10:11:57] #net-snmp <diablo> my boss ... ;-)
[2003/01/14 10:12:09] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: someting like this ;-)
[2003/01/14 10:12:30] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: but maybe I'll use the data for i/o usage, disk space & others
[2003/01/14 10:12:36] #net-snmp <TrogL> yep
[2003/01/14 10:12:59] #net-snmp <diablo> TrogL: thx a lot for the help
[2003/01/14 10:13:10] #net-snmp <diablo> I'm going back to work ;)
[2003/01/14 10:13:12] #net-snmp <diablo> see ya
[2003/01/14 10:24:06] #net-snmp <TrogL> if I do my builds in 2.95.3, is this gonna be acceptable as binaries? I'm not ready to go to gcc 3.2 right now
[2003/01/14 10:25:43] #net-snmp <wes> shouldn't matter.
[2003/01/14 10:28:12] #net-snmp <nostaw> why does MD5 use USM_LENGTH_KU_HASHBLOCK * 8 in MDupdate(&MD, buf, USM_LENGTH_KU_HASHBLOCK * 8)
[2003/01/14 10:28:45] #net-snmp <nostaw> isn't the length of "buf" 64 ?
[2003/01/14 10:34:03] #net-snmp <wes> because the api is for bits
[2003/01/14 10:34:40] #net-snmp <nostaw> damn.... i missed that.
[2003/01/14 10:34:48] #net-snmp <nostaw> ACTION boes his head in shame.
[2003/01/14 10:35:33] #net-snmp <nostaw> I'm trying to shoehorn our SHA1 stuff into keytools.c without disrupting too much code.
[2003/01/14 10:41:05] #net-snmp <TrogL> the primary reason I'm considering going to packages is disk space
[2003/01/14 10:41:17] #net-snmp <TrogL> some of my machines (and I'm sure others) are rather tight with /usr
[2003/01/14 10:41:31] #net-snmp <TrogL> so if I have to dump a huge tarball into /usr to break it up, I'm gonna run out of room
[2003/01/14 10:41:53] #net-snmp <TrogL> now if the tarball can hang someplace else and then decompress into /usr/local/ i'm all set
[2003/01/14 10:41:58] #net-snmp <TrogL> but I don't know how to do that
[2003/01/14 10:43:23] #net-snmp <TrogL> and I don't wanna get fancy with gzip or zip because I can't guarantee it's gonna be there
[2003/01/14 10:44:32] #net-snmp <TrogL> packages also make version control tidier
[2003/01/14 10:45:20] #net-snmp <TrogL> so do you want tarballs of binaries now to get off the ground and wait for me to sort out how to make packages?
[2003/01/14 10:45:32] #net-snmp <TrogL> or go straight with packages?
[2003/01/14 10:45:49] #net-snmp <TrogL> how are the linux etc. binaries coming?
[2003/01/14 10:46:03] #net-snmp <wes> rstory is doing the packaging (or said he was)
[2003/01/14 10:46:13] #net-snmp <wes> (I'm off for a bit...)
[2003/01/14 10:46:17] #net-snmp <TrogL> for Solaris?
[2003/01/14 10:46:25] #net-snmp <wes> you'd have to ask him.
[2003/01/14 10:46:30] #net-snmp <TrogL> k
[2003/01/14 10:46:47] #net-snmp <wes> If he is, it's just tar balls not official solaris packaging.
[2003/01/14 10:47:04] #net-snmp <TrogL> ah
[2003/01/14 10:47:42] #net-snmp <TrogL> Ok, then I'll concentrate on packages
--> tca has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 11:57:39] #net-snmp <tca> greetings
[2003/01/14 12:10:44] #net-snmp <tca> noone seems alive, but i'll pose my questions anyways.
[2003/01/14 12:11:16] #net-snmp <tca> so i'm trying to move my older ucd-snmp code utilizing GETNEXT to net-snmp without much luck so far
[2003/01/14 12:11:42] #net-snmp <tca> currently I'm trying to reuse the response packet to perform the subsequent getnexts
[2003/01/14 12:12:36] #net-snmp <tca> by setting response->command = SNMP_MSG_GETNEXT and then calling 'snmp_synch_response()' on it
[2003/01/14 12:13:02] #net-snmp <tca> this used to work, but I now notice that even the very first getnext query returns the wrong result
[2003/01/14 12:13:35] #net-snmp <tca> for example my first query is for the top of the ifindex tree 'interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex'
[2003/01/14 12:13:51] #net-snmp <tca> which should return '.1' but I get
[2003/01/14 12:13:59] #net-snmp <tca> '.2' from the query
[2003/01/14 12:14:21] #net-snmp <tca> on the very first query!?!
[2003/01/14 12:14:43] #net-snmp <tca> anyone have a getnext example? or suggestions?
[2003/01/14 12:20:01] #net-snmp <wes> sorry, have to wander away and just read what you said.. Quick response: it should work. The api shouldn't have changed.
[2003/01/14 12:26:54] #net-snmp <tca> wierd
[2003/01/14 12:27:24] #net-snmp <tca> cuz with some further debugging, my first query definately results in .2 instead of .1 (which the binary snmpgetnext does return properly)
[2003/01/14 12:27:59] #net-snmp <tca> i noticed snmpgetnext.c uses netsnmp_session and netsnmp_pdu, etc.
[2003/01/14 12:32:56] #net-snmp <tca> hmm..i noticed the 5.x.x tutuorial uses read_objid, which I'm switched too, although I was using snmp_parse_oid previously
[2003/01/14 12:35:26] #net-snmp <tca> just rechecked my code compiled against 4.2.6 and its fine :/
--> Rupy has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 12:50:40] #net-snmp <Rupy> i need help configuring my net-snmp
[2003/01/14 12:50:54] #net-snmp <Rupy> Jan 14 22:48:08 psycho net-snmp[3546]: Connection from udp:127.0.0.1:1037
[2003/01/14 12:51:08] #net-snmp <Rupy> snmpwalk -Os -c public 127.0.0.1 system
[2003/01/14 12:51:09] #net-snmp <Rupy> Timeout: No Response from 127.0.0.1
[2003/01/14 12:52:58] #net-snmp <TrogL> did you do the initial setup?
[2003/01/14 12:53:01] #net-snmp <Rupy> yes
[2003/01/14 12:53:24] #net-snmp <Rupy> my config looks like:
[2003/01/14 12:53:24] #net-snmp <Rupy> rwuser snmpuser
[2003/01/14 12:53:24] #net-snmp <Rupy> rwuser rw noauth
[2003/01/14 12:53:24] #net-snmp <Rupy> rouser ro noauth
[2003/01/14 12:53:24] #net-snmp <Rupy> rocommunity ro2
[2003/01/14 12:53:24] #net-snmp <Rupy> rwcommunity rw2
[2003/01/14 12:53:26] #net-snmp <Rupy> pass .1.3.6.1.4.1.4413.4.1 /usr/bin/ucd5820stat
[2003/01/14 12:53:28] #net-snmp <Rupy> load 12 12 12
[2003/01/14 12:53:30] #net-snmp <Rupy> syslocation Dodys / RDSLink / Timisoara / Romania
[2003/01/14 12:53:32] #net-snmp <Rupy> syscontact
[2003/01/14 12:53:34] #net-snmp <Rupy> sysservices 76
[2003/01/14 12:55:52] #net-snmp <TrogL> let's try something simple
[2003/01/14 12:56:05] #net-snmp <Rupy> ok
[2003/01/14 12:56:07] #net-snmp <TrogL> snmpwalk -v 2c -c public -m ALL localhost .1.3
[2003/01/14 12:56:28] #net-snmp <Rupy> Timeout: No Response from localhost
[2003/01/14 12:56:39] #net-snmp <TrogL> ps -ef | grep snmp
[2003/01/14 12:56:58] #net-snmp <Rupy> root 3546 1 0 22:40 pts/0 00:00:01 /usr/sbin/snmpd -s -l /dev/null
[2003/01/14 12:56:58] #net-snmp <Rupy> root 4764 3382 0 23:00 pts/0 00:00:00 grep snmp
[2003/01/14 12:57:13] #net-snmp <TrogL> what platform?
[2003/01/14 12:57:19] #net-snmp <Rupy> RH 8.0
[2003/01/14 12:59:00] #net-snmp <TrogL> where did you compile it to run? mine sits in /usr/local/sbin, not /usr/sbin
[2003/01/14 12:59:11] #net-snmp <TrogL> I do have one there, but it's stale
[2003/01/14 13:00:03] #net-snmp <Rupy> is from net-snmp-5.0.1-6.i386.rpm
[2003/01/14 13:00:25] #net-snmp <Rupy> i did not compile it ...
[2003/01/14 13:00:34] #net-snmp <TrogL> that's reeeeealy stale
--> mike has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 13:01:08] #net-snmp <TrogL> I'm more solaris - i'm hoping one of the linux guys will chime in
[2003/01/14 13:01:36] #net-snmp <Rupy> so, my snmpd.conf is ok ...
[2003/01/14 13:01:37] #net-snmp <Rupy> ?
[2003/01/14 13:01:56] #net-snmp <TrogL> I don't see anything specificaly wrong, but I'm not the expert in that
[2003/01/14 13:01:56] #net-snmp <Rupy> if so ... i'll try to compile a new version of net-snmp
[2003/01/14 13:02:06] #net-snmp <TrogL> 5.0.7 is out
[2003/01/14 13:02:29] #net-snmp <Rupy> k
[2003/01/14 13:02:34] #net-snmp <Rupy> thanx a lot
[2003/01/14 13:24:08] #net-snmp <TrogL> wes, if you're interested... I've got a tarball 5.0.7 under 2.95.3 solaris 2_6 no perl, no ssl, but with all the interesting mibs --enable-shared
[2003/01/14 13:24:49] #net-snmp <Rupy> i need only a snmpd.conf that works
[2003/01/14 13:25:41] #net-snmp <TrogL> here's a simple one:
[2003/01/14 13:25:52] #net-snmp <TrogL> syslocation "here"
[2003/01/14 13:26:02] #net-snmp <TrogL> sysservices 79
[2003/01/14 13:26:23] #net-snmp <TrogL> rouser myserver
[2003/01/14 13:26:27] #net-snmp <TrogL> rocommunity public
[2003/01/14 13:26:46] #net-snmp <TrogL> trapsink myserver public
[2003/01/14 13:26:57] #net-snmp <TrogL> trap2sink myserver public
[2003/01/14 13:27:06] #net-snmp <TrogL> informsink myserver public
[2003/01/14 13:27:09] #net-snmp <TrogL> trapcommunity public
[2003/01/14 13:27:47] #net-snmp <TrogL> no guarantees, but it's something
[2003/01/14 13:28:12] #net-snmp <Rupy> ok
[2003/01/14 13:28:17] #net-snmp <Rupy> thanks
[2003/01/14 13:28:21] #net-snmp <TrogL> use your server name for "myserver" use your community for "public"
[2003/01/14 13:28:28] #net-snmp <TrogL> lemme know if it works
[2003/01/14 13:28:36] #net-snmp <TrogL> hopefully wes will be back by then
[2003/01/14 13:31:32] #net-snmp <TrogL> make sure your modifying /usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf not /var/net-snmp
[2003/01/14 13:50:59] #net-snmp <Rupy> TrogL> thanks a lot
[2003/01/14 13:51:01] #net-snmp <Rupy> it's working
--> miike has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 14:06:12] #net-snmp <TrogL> kewl!
[2003/01/14 14:07:08] #net-snmp <Rupy> now trying to make mrtg too
[2003/01/14 14:07:09] #net-snmp <Rupy> :P
[2003/01/14 14:10:16] #net-snmp <wes> Well, I'm back but I don't know if there were outstanding questions that didn't get answered (it looks like they all did?)
[2003/01/14 14:10:16] #net-snmp <TrogL> can't help you there
[2003/01/14 14:10:26] #net-snmp <wes> TrogL: tell rstory about binaries built.
[2003/01/14 14:10:27] #net-snmp <TrogL> wanna tarball?
[2003/01/14 14:10:37] #net-snmp <TrogL> gcc 2.95.3
[2003/01/14 14:10:49] #net-snmp <TrogL> solaris 2_6 (8 available)
[2003/01/14 14:12:02] #net-snmp <TrogL> --with-mib-modules=host disman/event-mib ucd-snmp/diskio smux agentx mibII/mta_sendmail ucd-snmp/dlmod --with-cc=gcc --enable-shared
[2003/01/14 14:12:19] #net-snmp <TrogL> everything else set to default ie. /usr/local/whatever
[2003/01/14 14:12:32] #net-snmp <TrogL> no opensll on this system
[2003/01/14 14:12:49] #net-snmp <TrogL> left out Perl to avoid bazillion issuse discussed in readme.SOLARIS
[2003/01/14 14:13:37] #net-snmp <TrogL> if I could find a reliable openssl binary, i'll consider making a tarball with it
[2003/01/14 14:13:59] #net-snmp <TrogL> tarball was created using make install prefix=yada exec_prefix = yada
[2003/01/14 14:14:09] #net-snmp <TrogL> then tar cvf
[2003/01/14 14:14:45] #net-snmp <wes> sounds good... talk to rstory about it though... It's his task this time around.
[2003/01/14 14:15:25] #net-snmp <TrogL> you were talking about a new version of openssl - but you said it caused segfaults
[2003/01/14 14:15:28] #net-snmp <TrogL> did you resolve this?
[2003/01/14 14:15:30] #net-snmp <TrogL> is there a binary?
[2003/01/14 14:15:48] #net-snmp <nostaw> Hmmm... Got the Ku to create correctly with SHA...
[2003/01/14 14:15:49] #net-snmp <TrogL> can WE make a binary?
[2003/01/14 14:15:52] #net-snmp <nostaw> I'm getting better !
[2003/01/14 14:16:13] #net-snmp <nostaw> ACTION looks at the mouse in his pocket and says, *WE* cannot. ;-)
[2003/01/14 14:16:42] #net-snmp <wes> TrogL: I don't think the openssl stuff is an issue.
[2003/01/14 14:16:53] #net-snmp <wes> It's an odd case, that I will look into further but...
[2003/01/14 14:16:55] #net-snmp <TrogL> there's plenty of shops that won't let a compiler on systems
[2003/01/14 14:17:08] #net-snmp <TrogL> the openssl on sunfreeware is buggy
[2003/01/14 14:18:23] #net-snmp <TrogL> so if you want people to use thebinaries and v3, we'll need to do something so they can get ssl
[2003/01/14 14:18:35] #net-snmp <TrogL> unless the internal MD5 is sufficient
--> mike has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 14:20:49] #net-snmp <TrogL> the tarball is 24 mb - too big to fit on two of my systems
[2003/01/14 14:21:07] #net-snmp <TrogL> unless we can figure out a way to untar from another partition
[2003/01/14 14:21:35] #net-snmp <nostaw> they can modify snmplib/keytools.c and write their own HMAC-SHA1 code.
[2003/01/14 14:22:38] #net-snmp <wes> you can build openssl and link to static versions of the libarries.
[2003/01/14 14:23:15] #net-snmp <TrogL> will make install prefix=/foo pick them up?
[2003/01/14 14:24:08] #net-snmp <TrogL> or can we identify them and drop them in after the fact?
[2003/01/14 14:28:22] #net-snmp <wes> if you build against the static versions of the openssl libraries you don't need to put them in the tarbal.
[2003/01/14 14:28:34] #net-snmp <wes> (thats half of the point behind using static libraries)
[2003/01/14 14:29:46] #net-snmp <wes> back in a bit... gotta reboot for a new kernel.
--> snmpbot has joined #net-snmp
[2003/01/14 16:22:20] #net-snmp <benr> ACTION is away: they says I have to work.... or like they won't pay me.
[2003/01/14 16:34:21] #net-snmp <benr> ACTION is back (gone 00:11:59)
--> jmpnz has joined #net-snmp
--> jmpnz has joined #net-snmp